Try an author, a thought, or a phrase in “quotes”.↑ ↓ Navigate · Esc Close

0 words found

Explore all results ↗

Anton Chekhov

1860 AD — 1904 AD

Chekhov’s The Bet puts a confident argument beside the consequences of a wager. Read the unnamed guest’s claim and the narrator’s image of desperate reading as different voices in Garnett’s English translation.

Author and source reference ↗
▷ Play this voiceSearch within this voice ↗Place in time ↗truthwisdomlearningdeathhappinesslifelovetime

Life and writing

The catalogue identifies Anton Pavlovich Chekhov and gives his lifetime as 1860–1904. It names Constance Garnett as translator and identifies the collection as volume nine of the Tales of Chekhov. The linked text confirms that volume and translation credit, and includes The Bet among its stories. James Rusk and David Widger receive the digital credits. The checked record does not establish its print publisher or an ISBN, so those fields remain unspecified. Lifetime and electronic dates do not supply composition dates for the existing archive extracts.

Project Gutenberg catalogue — The Schoolmistress and Other Stories ↗Checked related reading — The Schoolmistress and Other Stories ↗ Catalogue identity/lifetime and linked edition credits, framing or cast

In section I of The Bet, an unnamed guest answers the banker’s comparison of execution and imprisonment by denying that the state may take what it cannot restore. That is the guest’s argument within the story, not legal advice or a statement attributed to every speaker. Later in the same section, the narrator compares the confined lawyer’s reading to someone grasping wreckage at sea. Both complete selected English extracts match the Garnett text under limited normalization. Read the change of voice and the wager’s consequences before treating either detached sentence as Chekhov’s personal instruction.

Checked related reading — The Schoolmistress and Other Stories ↗ The Bet, section I; an unnamed guest answers the banker’s comparison of punishments; The Bet, section I; narrator describes the confined lawyer’s later reading

Reading this voice

Read The Bet through both sections, beginning with the gathering’s argument and following what the wager costs its participants. The two selected extracts come from different voices within section I: an unnamed guest and the narrator. Both match this Garnett text under punctuation, case and spacing comparison. The local matches do not establish every Chekhov-labelled attribution or the translation behind it.

Subjects to explore

Editorial reading connections, distinct from the archive’s word matching.

A work to read

Begin with these archive passages

Editorial starting points from this author’s existing entries.

Profile sources and editorial status

Original agent-assisted editorial profile, checked 2026-10-05. No human review is recorded. Life dates are recorded to the year; they do not date individual quotations.

Archive entries

09Undated
Why are we worn out? Why do we, who start out so passionate, brave, noble, believing, become totally bankrupt by the age of thirty or thirty-five? Why is it that one is extinguished by consumption, another puts a bullet in his head, a third seeks oblivion in vodka, cards, a fourth, in order to stifle fear and anguish, cynically tramples underfoot the portrait of his pure, beautiful youth? Why is it that, once fallen, we do not try to rise, and, having lost one thing, we do not seek another? Why?
↗
13Undated
When describing nature, a writer should seize upon small details, arranging them so that the reader will see an image in his mind after he closes his eyes. For instance: you will capture the truth of a moonlit night if you'll write that a gleam like starlight shone from the pieces of a broken bottle, and then the dark, plump shadow of a dog or wolf appeared. You will bring life to nature only if you don't shrink from similes that liken its activities to those of humankind.", May 10, 1886)
↗
14Undated
If Makar Denisych was just a clerk or a junior manager, then no one would have dared talk to him in such a condescending, casual tone, but he is a 'writer', and a talentless mediocrity! returned a bad story to Makar recently is know to the whole district and has provoked mockery, long conversations and indignation, while Makar Denisych is already being referred to as old Makarka. If someone does not write the way required, they never try to explain what is wrong, but just say: 'That bastard has gone and written another load of rubbish!
↗
22Undated
Lebedev: France has a clear and defined policy... The French know what they want. They just want to wipe out the Krauts, finish, but Germany, my friend, is playing a very different tune. Germany has many more birds in her sights than just France...Shabelsky: Nonsense! ...In my view the German are cowards and the French are cowards... They're just thumbing their noses at each other. Believe me, things will stop there. They won't fight.Borkin: And as I see it, why fight? What's the point of these armaments, congresses, expenditures? You know what I'd do? I'd gather together dogs from all over the country, give them a good dose of rabies and let them loose in enemy country. In a month all my enemies would be running rabid.
↗