For those scientists who take it seriously, Darwinian evolution has functioned more as a philosophical belief system than as a testable scientific hypothesis. This quasi-religious function of the theory is, I think, what lies behind many of the extreme statements that you have doubtless encountered from some scientists opposing any critical analysis of neo-Darwinism in the classroom. It is also why many scientists make public statements about the theory that they would not defend privately to other scientists like me.

For those scientists who take it seriously, Darwinian evolution has functioned more as a philosophical belief system than as a testable scientific hypothesis. This quasi-religious function of the theory is, I think, what lies behind many of the extreme statements that you have doubtless encountered from some scientists opposing any critical analysis of neo-Darwinism in the classroom. It is also why many scientists make public statements about the theory that they would not defend privately to other scientists like me.

Source

Contributor-provided quotation collection
Supplied reference C; CSV row 61820; supplied attribution, independently unverified
Reuse and collection notes ↗

Attribution confidence

attributed · supplied collection
Preserved as printed; independently unverified.

Historical coordinate

Undated
No reliable date supplied by the collection.

Rights & edition

Contributor-confirmed reuse permission
Translations and rights may differ elsewhere.
Provenance and licences ↗