Try an author, a thought, or a phrase in “quotes”.↑ ↓ Navigate · Esc Close

0 words found

Explore all results ↗
Herman Melville: Painted portraitPainted portraitJoseph Oriel Eaton · Public domain

Herman Melville

Life dates: 1819 AD — 1891 AD

Melville’s novel lets Ishmael reconsider fear and fellowship through encounters with Queequeg. Follow the narrator’s changing understanding before treating his memorable sentences as detached rules.

▷ Play this voiceSearch these words ↗Place in time ↗mindtruthwisdomfaithtimehappinessfriendshipcharacter

Life and writing

The Gutenberg catalogue gives Melville’s lifetime as 1819–1891 and identifies this electronic text as based on the first American edition of 1851. Those bibliographical facts are separate from the archive’s supplied attributions and undated entries. The novel’s opening names Ishmael as its narrating voice. That distinction matters for the selected passages: the thoughts belong to a narrator describing encounters, not to a biographical declaration by Melville. The catalogue’s digital release and update dates are not composition dates, and its automatically generated summary is not used as evidence here.

In The Spouter-Inn, Ishmael’s statement about ignorance and fear is part of his alarm at an unfamiliar bedfellow. The surrounding language exposes his prejudiced assumptions rather than giving a neutral description of Queequeg. In A Bosom Friend, the narrator asks what worship means and argues for joining his companion’s practice through reciprocity. Both complete selected extracts match the checked English text under limited punctuation, case and spacing comparison. Reading the episodes together follows a change in fellowship without endorsing the narrator’s earlier insults or treating his theology as a universal instruction.

Reading this voice

Read Chapter 3 around the short fear statement, then Chapter 10 around the longer reflection on worship. Notice Ishmael’s initial assumptions and his later attempt at reciprocal fellowship with Queequeg. Both complete selected extracts match the linked edition under limited normalization. These are narrated thoughts inside a novel; a local source match does not establish every Melville-labelled record or turn a character’s religious reasoning into the author’s unqualified position.

Subjects to explore

Words to begin with

Quotations and sayings

01c. 1855 AD
Next morning the not-yet-subsided sea rolled in long slow billows of mighty bulk, and striving in the Pequod's gurgling track, pushed her on like giants' palms outspread. The strong, unstaggering breeze abounded so, that sky and air seemed vast outbellying sails; the whole world boomed before the wind. Muffled in the full morning light, the invisible sun was only known by the spread intensity of his place; where his bayonet rays moved on in stacks. Emblazonings, as of crowned Babylonian kings and queens, reigned over everything. The sea was as a crucible of molten gold, that bubblingly leaps with light and heat.
↗
04c. 1855 AD
Circumambulate the city of a dreamy Sabbath afternoon. Go from Corlears Hook to Coenties Slip, and from thence, by Whitehall, northward. What do you see?—Posted like silent sentinels all around the town, stand thousands upon thousands of mortal men fixed in ocean reveries. Some leaning against the spiles; some seated upon the pier-heads; some looking over the bulwarks glasses! of ships from China; some high aloft in the rigging, as if striving to get a still better seaward peep. But these are all landsmen; of week days pent up in lath and plaster— tied to counters, nailed to benches, clinched to desks. How then is this? Are the green fields gone?
↗
09c. 1855 AD
Now envy and antipathy, passions irreconcilable in reason, nevertheless in fact may spring conjoined like Chang and Eng in one birth. Is Envy then such a monster? Well, though many an arraigned mortal has in hopes of mitigated penalty pleaded guilty to horrible actions, did anybody ever seriously confess to envy? Something there is in it universally felt to be more shameful than even felonious crime. And not only does everybody disown it, but the better sort are inclined to incredulity when it is in earnest imputed to an intelligent man. But since it's lodgement is in the heart and not the brain, no degree of intellect supplies a guarantee against it.
↗
11c. 1855 AD
Very often do the captains of such ships take those absent-minded young philosopher to task, upbraiding them with not feeling sufficient "interest" in the voyage; half-hinting that they are so helplessly lost to all honourable ambition, as that in their secret souls they would rather not see whales than otherwise. But all in vain; those young Platonists have a notion that their vision is imperfect; they are short-sighted; what us, then, to strain the visual nerve? They have left their opera glasses at home.
↗